On page 58 of the LR Strategy Guide, it says the following
A successful person is also a smart person. [NOT sufficient]
A successful person is also a funny person. [NOT sufficient]
A successful person is also a smart and funny person. [IS sufficient]
I understand why they are all necessary assumptions because of the negation test; they are all required to reach the conclusion of "Therefore, Johnson is both smart and funny" from the premise of "Johnson is successful".
I don't understand why these statements are classified this way in the sufficient category. Can you please explain why?
Thanks!