I had to read it many times over to understand the explanations given.
In order for the Conclusion to be true, based on the premise — there has to be an equal number of Nappers & Non-Nappers.
I think I understand the ‘re-framing’ of what the correct ‘Answer’ confirms.

OK, these are the types of questions I get caught up on — I’m looking at specific connections when specific details are mentioned. Then, when I see the answer/explanation is more generalized — it seems obvious.
What strategy/habit can I practice to discern narrow & broad applications?

I'm just trying to understand the use of and/or correctly -- I know it seems minor, but is the 'correct' way to read the conditional statements by connecting 'new tires (NT) with crash (C), and replacement blinker (RB) with ticket (T)? I know it's just a drill, but if I'm missing a fundamental step,...