Search found 4 matches

Return to advanced search

by NanaN402
Sat Oct 24, 2020 5:15 pm
 
Forum: Passage #4 - Fractal Geometry
Topic: Q26
Replies: 9
Views: 3034
Jump to post

Re: Q26

I am still not following the logic of getting to the correct answer of E for this question. Also maybe it's just me, but I don't feel like I get full/clear explanations of these answers from this forum as it is more discussion-based. Is this the only form of result-based explanations for these prep ...
by NanaN402
Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:56 am
 
Forum: Section #3
Topic: Q8 - Economist: During a recession, a company
Replies: 6
Views: 2336
Jump to post

Re: Q8 - Economist: During a recession, a company

Is it safe to say that D would actually be more of a weakener for this question? If the argument needs us to take the goal of "choosing layoffs over cutting wages" as the main point we need to strengthen, wouldn't D inherently be going against that by giving a reason as to why we should in...
by NanaN402
Mon Sep 06, 2021 9:44 am
 
Forum: Section #1
Topic: Q9 - If the winner of a promotional contest is selected
Replies: 2
Views: 382
Jump to post

Re: Q9 - If the winner of a promotional contest is selected

Hi there, Thank you for the explanation. I am still having trouble with this question. When I look at this question and notice our task is to strengthen the argument, I identified the conclusion of the argument to be that the lottery DID NOT meet the fairness requirement, so if we want to strengthen...
by NanaN402
Wed Sep 29, 2021 2:50 pm
 
Forum: Section #3
Topic: Q13 - Science cannot adequately explain emotional phenomena
Replies: 2
Views: 277
Jump to post

Re: Q13 - Science cannot adequately explain emotional phenomena

@ElissaG364 Here is my take on explaining Mistaken Reversals and Mistaken Negations: When a mistaken reversal is committed, this will literally reverse the sufficient and necessary conditions. The problem is we know this is illegal in formal logic world. Using the premises from this question as the ...