So since this is a matching question I know my first step should be to simplify the arguement as much as possible which I think can be boiled down to something similar to... Restrictions for R X is ALL regulations except Y & Z R's restrictions are ~Y and ~Z So X's regulations cover R's restricti...

The Question States "Which of the following could be a complete and accurate list of each of the office buildings that the falafel truck serves" We know that the Falafel truck serves Y so we can easily eliminate any that don't include Y so A, B, and E are gone C and D both include Y I choo...

This is a describe the flaw question... My first step is to determine what flaw is present in the arguement and I think I have that part... Basically both our premis and conclusion are conditional statements The premise says: P3 --> E Conclusion E --> P3 (P3 = practice 3 hours & E = Expert...

So that's why E is the wrong answer.

So can we expand on that and explain why D is a wrong answer and why C is the right answer?

Thanks for the help!

Step 1: Identify the question type I believe that this is a Principle conforms to reasoning question Step 2: Identify Premise and Conclusion I believe the conclusion is " one should not always purchase technologically advanced educational tools" The Premise I believe has two parts 1. Engin...

Question Type: Main Conclusion Conclusion: The financial saving involved in using ASA over TPA must also be weighte against such considerations (such considerations is borrowed language from the premise which states the relatives of the patients who die simply because they were given the less expens...

This question has me stumped... First...I'm not sure if this is an identify the disagreement question because there are two people whose statements we need to read in order to understand the arguement or if this is an assumption question since the question stem says "Trent's argument assumes th...

I'm sorry I honstly don't even know where to begin with this question I've read it multiple times and just seem to get lost I think this is an inference question So that would mean that this is a set of facts without a premise or conclusion so more likely then not the correct answer will synthesize ...