Figured I would post my private notes here, in case the reasoning is flawed or anyone else might benefit from them: Dang, this is a question. .. ok. Justified in praising/blaming action - > we know alot about events that lead to it We DONT know alot about events -> We are not justified in prai...

A is wrong because while CT is the only defense against PD, PD's need not exist, so A *Could Be True*. B is wrong because while PD's do use emotional language as an objective description of reality, other types of demagogues could too, or just other kinds of people! so it *Could Be True* C is wrong ...

I feel like in retrospect I get why C is correct: it involves 2 parties where 1 party is being held responsible for the actions of the other because they in some way supported the actions. In the _Shelly_ case it's the government bearing responsibility for race-based covenants because it enforces th...