Someone please help. The ambassador game makes little sense to me. Even when I plot out the graph I miss out on certain details that confuse me. And I don't have enough time to go back and try to correct it.

But how do I know when a section of the argument counts as "evidence"? Every part of the argument is an assumption you must take for granted. Maybe if it says something specific about a claim. Like if the journalist somehow confirmed the list had the names of every single trade group in it...

"No such thing as a cat incapable of provoking allergic reactions." Implies that everyone is allergic to some cats. If someone was not allergic to any cat, then there would be a case where a cat is incapable of provoking an allergic reaction. That is why I chose A, because that makes sense...

After months of studying my score has bumped up from 146 to 154, which is at most average. I took the September test and am trying to do better for the November test. All my problems with LR (and maybe RC) probably boil down to one thing. I have trouble reading past all the word salad. It's like I h...

I can see why I rejected (E), even though it is the right answer. I didn't think the argument was truly an analogy. If you meet most people in the street and ask them what is an argument from analogy, they will tell you it compares two scenarios or sets of things rather than two things themselves. S...