Pretty much. Here's an example: Person A: Flying debris causes eye injuries, so workers should wear safety goggles. Person B: That's stupid. Inattentiveness causes way more injuries than flying debris. What's wrong here? Person B has suggested another problem, but has done nothing to prove why Pers...

Okay, I'm still confused about this question. I was not confused about the assumption type. I knew this was necessary but here's my train of thought for this q and why I picked D. So interpretations impose meaning, instead of discovering meaning and they don't NEED to consider the writer's intention...

Hello there. I'm having trouble with why the correct answer would be B instead of A. I thought it was people who drive infrequently and are involved in more accidents in small roads does weaken the argument? Please explain this one to me. I'm really not understanding why B is correct. Thanks in adva...

Thank you! I get it now!