Search found 4 matches

Return to advanced search

by MichaelW907
Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:26 pm
 
Forum: General Questions - LR
Topic: Argument Core Question
Replies: 1
Views: 74
Jump to post

Argument Core Question

I have a serious problem with some arguments that seem to be written in a really bad shape. Say PT29-S1-Q14 I can reduce the argument core to as follows: P: we have conclusive evidence the moon was full and Dr. Yuge acknowledges that the moon was full enough C: the light was enough I was just very c...
by MichaelW907
Mon Oct 16, 2017 3:41 am
 
Forum: Section #2
Topic: Q11 - Some psychologists claim that
Replies: 14
Views: 5120
Jump to post

Re: Q11 - Some psychologists claim that

I break down the argument in a totally different way, after spending some time though. And for me the answer then came pretty apparent: P: THEORETICALLY, the best way, as some psychologists claim, would lead to no understanding at all [because a direct and complete grasp of motivations causes deep e...
by MichaelW907
Tue Oct 17, 2017 9:18 pm
 
Forum: Manhattan LSAT Logic Challenges
Topic: Logic Challenge #32 - The Graduation Game (Hard)
Replies: 16
Views: 8813
Jump to post

Re: Logic Challenge #32 - The Graduation Game (Hard)

One quick question:

Two years apart means just one year in between? not two years in between?

Had a problem of this and Question 1 made me to realize this problem.
by MichaelW907
Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:15 am
 
Forum: Manhattan LSAT Logic Challenges
Topic: Logic Challenge #19 - Lab Projects
Replies: 8
Views: 4924
Jump to post

Re: Logic Challenge #19 - Lab Projects

Can someone please kindly explain rule More researchers are assigned to week 3 than either week 1 or week 2. For me it basically means week 3 has more researchers than at least one of weeks 1 and 2 Therefore there are basically four possibilities: (1) _____ _____ _____ F H 8 10 10 12 (2) _____ _____...