Hi all,

I'm uncomfortable with (D) in that an earlier component of the stimulus (the part we're asked to identify function of) is described as being an objection to something that follows. Is it okay for an objection to precede the point being objected to? Thanks!

Hi guys, I went with (A). Only (C) would have made perfect sense if not for the first sentence: "One way to compare chess-playing program s ." I thought the whole passage was about comparing programs, not how one single program runs differently on different computers. Because of this I saw...