Search found 4 matches

Return to advanced search

by arya.bhaskar1987
Sun May 22, 2016 2:38 pm
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q10 - Albert: The government has proposed
Replies: 15
Views: 6152
Jump to post

Re: Q10 - Albert: The government has proposed

Hi, Actually I felt Erin's conclusion is "So the proposed regulations would save thousands of lives". Albert tries to undermine that using (D), i.e., saying that most PAHs are due to wear and tear and reasons not addressed by the proposed regulations. However, even if most of the PAHs (let...
by arya.bhaskar1987
Sun May 22, 2016 2:47 pm
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q11 - Australia has considerably fewer species
Replies: 16
Views: 6272
Jump to post

Re: Q11 - Australia has considerably fewer species

While I must admit I chose (A), on reviewing, I realize that the first sentence is purely factual. I believe, a statement could be a conclusion supported by premises and explanations in case it is a logical inference. However, this is just fact or as Matt calls 'a phenomenon' (like reading out of wi...
by arya.bhaskar1987
Tue May 24, 2016 3:45 am
 
Forum: Section #1
Topic: Q13 - Medical researcher: Scientists compared a large group
Replies: 18
Views: 7994
Jump to post

Re: Q13 - Medical researcher: Scientists compared a large group

Actually Answer choice (C) would fit better had a study indicated that joggers who stretch had lesser injuries and had the researcher concluded that the same is attributable to the stretching. In that case (C) would surely weaken the argument, imo. :)
by arya.bhaskar1987
Mon May 30, 2016 3:36 am
 
Forum: Passage #1 - Disaster Relief
Topic: Q6
Replies: 5
Views: 1863
Jump to post

Re: Q6

Hi. Just wanted to understand whether in Answer Choice (E), ".. with little accountability to populations affected by disasters." means the populations affected have not taken up accountability or that they programs implemented by donors and agencies have been with little accountability to...