I'm still a little bit confused about the "individually sufficient" part. According to the argument the vegetarians not only propose two reasons but also argue that they are individually sufficient. I don't think the argument explicitly opposes the "individually sufficient" part....

Thank you guys! I made the same mistake as I take " neither S or U is immediately beside N" for "neither S or U is in the same row as N". But that distinction poses a question here, since the question says "Only seats in the same row are immediately beside each other." ...

tommywallach Wrote:I think the sentence is entirely logical. Your misread is something they wanted you to do, but it isn't justified by the text. If I say "Only fish can be friendly," it doesn't mean fish have to be friendly.

-t

Yes. Thank you, T. I get it now.

Thank you tutors ! I also got this wrong. But now I can see that B is more close to the main point the author intends to make. A minor question: Is "the average temperature each year for the last five years has been higher than any previous yearly average on record" the same thing as "...

I also chose B ! Here's my thought process (in case anybody's interested in why anyone choose B) I think B resolves the discrepancy by assuming a climate change between 3.8B and 2B. In the 3.8, it was hot, and there was liquid and life. In 2B, it was cold(dim), and there's no liquid, no life. As a m...

Hey Muriella, Actually, there's no difference really. However, the VAST majority of questions do not play this game, so it's still worth accepting as a rule that you should always accept the premises as true. The ONE thing you can keep on the lookout for is REALLY WEAK premises. For example: Premis...