The one thing I didn't like about answer choice E was "Thus, if the next artifact found at the site is made of stone..." I thought it was implying only the next immediate finding, as opposed to the stimulus which was much broader, " any future proposal... will probably be passed as we...

Can someone explain the language of Answer Choice C? I couldn't decipher it during the test, but felt it was along the lines of, taking an argument that is necessary to disprove an argument, to mean that it sufficiently disproves the argument.

Similar to answer E...

Why is the first line not the overall conclusion vs. "But that is an irresponsible approach"?

I need someone to explain why Answer choice C is wrong, without using negation. I thought the argument had a gap between "genetically engineered cropped not NEEDING insecticide" and "the reality of the GEC NEVER being sprayed". Just because something doesn't need something, it do...

Thanks for the question and response. I'll put up a complete explanation for posterity, but the quick punchline for the original poster is, "you're right. B is wrong because of ALWAYS." (B) is identical to (D), except for "absence ALWAYS LEADS to failure" vs. "absence is AS...

I don't understand why C isn't a viable answer. I took C to be negating a possible problem, of, "Maybe sea creatures can wreak havoc even if they don't survive being offloaded! Maybe their corpses could add pollutants to that area of the sea?" I saw that E was a necessary assumption as wel...