I still don't get why E is not the answer. Is it not the final conclusion that was drawn by the Biologist?

I still can't seem to understand why B cannot be the answer. Wouldn't negating B also invalidate the conclusion? Also, since the argument focuses on the average duration of vertigo wouldn't it be necessary for no change to occur in the average duration of vertigo? I can understand why A is the answe...

How did you get ~CRA ---> ~HG??

According to the LR book, A--->B and A--->C is NOT B--->C.

Also, why is option B not a valid answer?

I don't understand why answer choice C can't be the right answer?

Because, Jasmine gets off the van before Fundy and that leads Greg to getting off the van before Simcoe. So technically the last rule is still satisfied.

I understand why E is the right answer but I cannot get why C is wrong.

I can't seem to understand why can't C and E be the answer?

I don’t understand why E is out of scope? If people are most likely to practice behavior modification because they don’t prefer taking drugs, then the conclusion will be questioned, because it’s not that it’s more effective it’s just that out of the two choices, behavior modification is their only o...

What would be the best way to approach this question? Is it plugging in the answer choices and checking or is there a better way?

G - 6
G
R
R
G
W - 1

Can this be a possible combination?

Since the second rule says there has to be one box with a green ball lower than any of the boxes containing red balls? It does not say that all green balls have to be lower than all the red balls.

G - 6
G
R
R
G
W - 1

Can this be a possible combination?

Since the second rule says there has to be one box with a green ball lower than any of the boxes containing red balls? It does not say that all green balls have to be lower than all the red balls.

From the above explanation I understood two things about the argument: 1) We have to assume that a promise to do something is the same as an obligation to do something. 2) Just because she could not do something does not mean she ought not. But why are we assuming the second point? Also, how does an...

What does the argument core for this arugment look like? Which one is the main conclusion and which one is the intermediate conclusion?

How do we know that when N is out, K is in?

I can have an arrangement that says:

K: Venezuela, O: Yemen, L: Zambia

Is this not a possible arrangement?

Is E wrong because it’s too broad? Bceause it generally talks about business failures and not those related to new technology?

If there was a question that asked “What role is played by the statement some governmental control is needed?”, and there was an answer choice that said : “It is an intermediate conclusion offered in support of the main conclusion and supported by the claim that television is important polictically ...