Search found 4 matches

Return to advanced search

by Alvanith.law
Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:23 am
 
Forum: Passage #2 - Objectivism
Topic: Q16
Replies: 3
Views: 813
Jump to post

Re: Q16

Hi p.k.sharma901 I guess the question stems actually asks the opinion of "those who reject objectivism" towards "the law's quest for truth," rather than the opinion from the proponents of the objectivism. The objectivism, as you generalized, is searching for "a neutral event...
by Alvanith.law
Sun Dec 01, 2013 6:03 am
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q19 - Many people change their wills
Replies: 9
Views: 4445
Jump to post

Re: Q19 - Many people change their wills

I guess the problem with B is that the "containment of the adverse effects that the problem might cause" is never mentioned in the argument. The key is to know what is the problem and not to confuse the problem with its adverse effects. The argument says the problem is that the executor wi...
by Alvanith.law
Sun Dec 01, 2013 11:44 am
 
Forum: Section #4
Topic: Q21 - Political scientist: As a political
Replies: 7
Views: 4163
Jump to post

Re: Q21 - Political scientist: As a political

I guess the author actually hinges on the necessary condition and the sufficient condition of the political freedom. C: democracy does not promote political freedom. P1: some democracies did not result in political freedom. P2: some non-democracies did provide political freedom. P1 implies that demo...
by Alvanith.law
Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:57 am
 
Forum: Section #2
Topic: Q17 - Of the two proposals
Replies: 11
Views: 3581
Jump to post

Re: Q17 - Of the two proposals

I am a little bit confused. I chose (e) but based on another perception of the flaw. The stimulus is essentially: P: B is bad. C: A is better than B. I thought the problem is that we know nothing about A. Even though B is truly bad, we cannot reach a conclusion that A must be better. A could be even...