The only way I can make this work in my head is if there is only one neighborhood in the city of Mooresville. It seems that there actually be a substantial change to the council's membership if there is more than one neighborhood. Is this correct? For #3, The conclusion of the argument is that the t...

You say D is wrong because it leaves out the environmentalists. But why is it necessary to address them specifically in the answer choice. A does not address environmentalists specifically; it addresses "people." My understanding is that principles are more general than the stimulus. Is D ...

I'll have to disagree with matt sherman on this one. The reason why C is wrong is because the last part of the answer choice refers to a situation in which employees do not participate. We don't know anything about this situation; what if they contributed to the generation of ideas without participa...

How do we know that we can assume requirements to report gunshot wounds are ethical?

Why not answer choice C?

Can't it refer to the overall outcome including both the intended effects and the potential side effects?

Even though (A) is indeed extreme, does it not still provide strong justification if we assumed it to be true? I chose (A) because it seemed to link the gap between the premise and the first conclusion signaled by "Thus." This argument boils down to this: We should judge a person's aesthet...

How do we know that "outcome" doesn't refer to side effects?

If parents could assess the situation and make decisions for the infant, would not still be possible that "pain protocols for human beings are unnecessary?" Debbie is basically saying, listen people can be told by doctors of how much pain is to be expected for surgery, and then they can ma...

How do we know that there are not any other present or future ways other than the developing techniques that may slow or prevent the deterioration of acidic paper? This is an inference question, as you correctly noted. We're told: -almost all (i.e. most) books in last 150 years were on acidic paper ...

Help.

Thanks for the question! The magazine editor concludes that it would be against advertisers' interest for the magazine to yield to their pressure and give their products favorable mention in the magazine's articles. This is based on two premises: to be an effective advertising vehicle, the magazine...

(You're probably thinking, "How do we know there isn't some OTHER explanation for why its brain is so large?" There might be, but it would still be accurate to say that within this paragraph that the anteater's unusually large brain is unexplained otherwise) Exactly, the question mentione...

Chose D instead of C. Didn't realize that serving as research associate counted as work exp. Later realized that C was talking about business not one of the 3 required fields. Am I missing anything?

What's to say that the one motive is not a motive to help preserve the environment? I can see why you'd be frustrated with this one, but answer choice (A) would make the environmentalist's conclusion follow, if everything in the environmentalist's argument is true. If the oil company admitted in a p...

"partially confirmed" gives it away. but how do we know for sure that there is an "otherwise unexplained set of facts?"

help please

I can't seem to figure out why C won't work even though A does make some sense. Can someone please help

I chose A, can someone explain why B please and thank you.

D seemed to broad, so I chose E. I can see why it is D now but I feel that if I were to run into the situation again, I would still chose E. How can I easily differentiate and make the right choice?