I don't know if it'll help, but here's my two cents: I loved this question. Easy read, easy answer. Maybe because I'm partial to the subject matter. Funny, because I also know it's generally unwise to bring in "outside" info to these LSAT questions, but as soon as I saw the word "anar...

From earlier : I think you're interpreting the wording incorrectly. The author states that economists view consumption as a measure of economic well-being and it is this preoccupation that prevents us from understanding the true nature of economic well-being (whatever that is). (A) perfectly captur...

I'm just going to throw my two cents in here because I found this question to be extremely frustrating for some odd reason. Having worked through it, it makes more sense. In fact, reading through this thread actually made me even more confused. And, frankly, I disagree with some of the interpretatio...

Although the Roger/Linda example is starting to make sense, I'm still a little confused about (A). I unfortunately crossed it off because I saw (A) as a restatement of the conclusion so I'm not sure how it can be an assumption as well. The argument involves a noticeable scope shift (or two). The ex...

I know the previous post is quite a bit old (a year, almost), but I thought I'd add for anyone who was having problems between (A) and (C). Commentator points out that some people argue that since most journalists identify themselves as being politically liberal, there is a liberal bias in journalis...