perhaps I overanalyzed this one (is that possible on LSAT?)...but it's the word "significant" in choice C that still has me convinced it's less than perfect, albeit better than the other choices.

it's the different application of the word "rate" that tripped me up; we're talking about tax rates and, in answer C, also sales rates...tricky indeed!

aren't they still under darkness when plowed at night, only to get their brief germinating sunlight at sunrise?

As is common, I've worked many of the same games, over and over.... I recall the guide's reassurance that redoing games contributes toward mastery. My question is this: do the returns diminish (counterproductive even?) when you've timed and dissected a game, say 5x's, and you almost instantly recogn...

While I like Noah's explanation for (D), this initial explanation may have contributed to the confusion: "(E) is confusing...Preserve increases...Valley.... remains the same. ...It must mean that bears are moving from other parts of the Valley to the Preserve section..." Not necessarily; c...

With regard to the inference you made, I don't understand how you can say the bill won't come before the legislature. Doesn't that imply that you've negated the necessary of a conditional that is not one? Namely, aren't you illegally negating the idea: "majority usually ready to vote for it.&qu...

All is clear now. Thanks so much for the fast reply!!!

WTF...how did this one get past the experimental phase? I don't get it.

Why must they choose from among only top or bottom appearances? What if we had occurrences and guesses on the right/left side of the screen? Then D need not be true, no?