If you re-arrange answer choice E.. life becomes easier.. Think of E as this: All substances are considered natural, EXCEPT the substances that DO NOT occur naturally in any source. The reason answer choice (E) is correct is because sugarcane IS in fact natural(aka does occur naturally ), therefore ...

The first sentence in the stim is just a definition of theoretical framework. The juicy stuff (aka the stuff we need is in the next 2 sentences) Basically the passage is stating: history research is done best in theoretical frame work bullshit, but the past is too complicated for this theoretical fr...

C casts darkness on the conclusion by stating the fact that VERY FEW species that were NOT killed by the people from Asia were extinct. Think of a groups of animals such as elephants, giraffes, snakes, monkeys, snails and zebras. Lets assume elephants and giraffes were killed off by the Asians and t...

In this one I charted the stimulus as.... P= purpose of art D= debate about art QA=qualifies as art Conclusion:P -> D Premise:D-> QA I inferred right away that the answer might be P->QA because if P->D and D->A then we can infer that P->QA.. keep in mind the conclusion is what art ...

If you negate D this argument falls apart, thus proven correct via negation technique. Conclusion: film producers...tend to make films that theater managers consider attractive to younger audiences. This conclusion was drawn from the claim that the theater managers will not rent a film if they do no...

Okay, this one you should chart to get the answer rapid fast.. This is how you do it W= warm during winter G=gloves M=mittens X=extra clothes V=vital organs CONCLUSION: W-> ~g or ~m W -> X V-> W To weaken an argument you must do 1 of 2 things 1.) attack on premise to disprove the conclusion...

*First note that this is not an argument, it's a set of facts. To correctly solve this (or any) discrepancy question we are posed with 2 situations and an answer choice must meet the following 2 conditions 1.) it must prove one or both the situations to be correct. (can just prove one to be correct ...

Listen if you didn't notice there is a difference between PEOPLE and PROBLEMS the first time you read it.. keep that in mind and read again. 60 PROBLEMS were studied on a DIVERSE SAMPLE (DOESN'T TELL US HOW MANY PEOPLE JUST THE # OF PROBLEMS) .. okay that can mean that 59 of them only affected one p...

I dont understand something with Sufficient Assumption questions.. If V-> ~KAL and the conclusion is V->~FS How do you know the assumption is ~KAL -> ~FS and not ~FS -> ~KAL As I remember if A->B and A->C then that means B some C... How do you know which way the arrows point(or whi...