Public safety expert: The anti-terrorist measures in place at airports can sometimes have comic results, but they are necessary. A passenger on a recent European flight was detained for several hours after a Faberge egg in her carry-on luggage was mistaken for a grenade. While several pundits decried this as a classic example of overzealous security, the woman admitted that the egg probably did resemble a grenade under the x-ray scanner. Isn’t it better to be safe than sorry?
Which of the following is mentioned as an opposing point to the main conclusion?
At least one security incident at an airport was a comic misunderstanding.
Can anyone explain the logic behind this one?