Q9

 
camillebachrach
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 8
Joined: November 16th, 2015
 
 
 

Q9

by camillebachrach Tue Jul 19, 2016 7:23 pm

Hi! I just wanted to know where the support for answer choice B came from in the passage. And why D & E are incorrect Thank you!
User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:50 pm

Hi camillebachrach!

The author takes a neutral position between scientists and humanists. Answer choice (B) comes directly from lines 4-8.

Incorrect Answers
(A) takes the side of the humanists, which the author does not do.
(C) is unsupported. The passages suggests that some humanists believe that science is reductionist. But this is NOT asserted about the humanists by the scientists.
(D) takes the side of the humanists, which the author does not do.
(E) takes the side of the scientists, which the author does not do.
 
JenniferK632
Thanks Received: 0
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 43
Joined: January 18th, 2020
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by JenniferK632 Sat Jul 04, 2020 7:45 pm

Would it also be valid to say that answer choice (c) was also wrong because of its red flag extreme language? (i.e. the excessive influence)

Thank you!
 
Laura Damone
Thanks Received: 94
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 468
Joined: February 17th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q9

by Laura Damone Fri Jul 10, 2020 3:28 pm

I'd say it's the interpretation issue that makes it wrong, not the degree issue. Reductionism is cited as something humanists identify with science. That's a problem. But it's not explicitly cited as a problem scientists have with humanists. If it doesn't explain both, it's not the cause of the divide.

But, does "excessive" give me pause? Absolutely. Red flag, but not itself a fatal flaw.
Laura Damone
LSAT Content & Curriculum Lead | Manhattan Prep