Nina
Thanks Received: 0
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 103
Joined: October 15th, 2012
 
 
 

Q9 - a running track with a hard surface

by Nina Thu Apr 25, 2013 6:34 pm

how would we categorize this question? i feel like in arguing "the explanation given above is only a partial one", answer choice can go both ways: either strengthen, if the answer choice provide other evidence of why a hard surface makes greater speed, or weaken, if the answer choice says there many be other factors of the hard track that reduce speed but the author fails to consider.
and the correct answer C is a strengthener.
and is answer D wrong because we don't know if the track that produces the "world's fatest running times" is a hard track?

Thanks a lot!
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 5 times.
 
 

Re: Q9 - a running track with a hard surface

by ohthatpatrick Tue Apr 30, 2013 2:49 pm

Good question.

Ultimately, I think this question defies any straightforward categorization, and it just serves as a reminder that we always have to be ready to roll with the punches.

You could call this Strengthen, if you think of your Conclusion as "the explanation above is only a partial one".

Or you could call this Weaken, if you think of your task as finding an alternate explanation, different from the one the argument cited.

In truth, I wouldn't bother trying to categorize it. I just want to be clear on what I need out of the correct answer.

They want me to find evidence that the explanation given above is only a partial one.

What explanation was given above?

It was explained that hard surfaces make for greater running speeds because they let the runner's foot make contact for less time.

So our job is to say, "Yes, hard surfaces allow the runner's foot to make contact for less time ... but there's also ANOTHER reason hard surfaces make for greater running speeds."

All I would be thinking going into the answer choices is, "which of these gives me ANOTHER reason why hard surfaces make for greater running speeds than soft ones?"

(A),(B), and (D) aren't even about hard surfaces vs. soft ones, so they're not worth thinking about.

(C) gives a reason that hard surfaces make for greater running speeds (we just have to make the common sense connection that "minimizing wind resistance" could allow for "greater running speeds").

(E) gives a distinction between hard and soft surfaces, but "different maintenance procedures" doesn't allow us to make any common sense connection to "greater running speeds".

Hope this helps.