For what it's worth, here's my thought process. Hope it helps someone out... IN THE FUTURE
stim:
-Wst 55M:45F (not so great disparity, adult males might not outnumber adult females), Est 65M:35F (great disparity, greater pop of males)
-more M than F ducks
-only slightly more M than F in young
-way more M than F in older
conclusion:
greater disparity in gender ratio = greater percentage of older male ducks in population.
answers:
(A) looks good so far, come back.
(B) we're concerned with adult males, not all adult ducks; eliminate.
(C) good, come back.
(D) talks about hatching ducks, out of scope; eliminate.
(E) we're concerned with adult males, not females; eliminate.
(A) vs (C):
(A) talks about the percentage of male ducks, while (C) talks about "total number of males". We don't know anything about the actual # of ducks in either lake, we only know about the sex ratios, thus (A) is tighter match than (C). (A) states that the western lake contains a lower percentage of males than the eastern lake? can this be true? Stim says "Greater disparity in sex ratio = greater % of adult males". West has 55:45, east has 65:35. Therefore, west has a lower percentage and east has a higher percentage.
answer ---> (A).