User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Fri Dec 31, 1999 8:00 pm

Sometimes it's tough not to read too much into these questions. I think in this case you are. The author says that bipedalism offered advantages for both those who left the forest and those who remained.

Those who left the forest would be able to see over tall grasses to find food and spot predators.

Those who did not leave the forest floor would be able to reach food that they wouldn't have been able to otherwise.


The debate is about where bipedalism developed and because it would have offered advantages both to those hominids that left the forest for the grasslands and for those who didn't, we cannot be certain where the trait developed.

(A) is a comparison between two places about which we cannot be sure which was more hospitable.
(B) can be inferred since it is mentioned in both groups.
(C) is contradicted by the stimulus because the author does not challenge whether those scientists are correct, but rather simply presents the debate.
(D) has a similar flaw to answer choice (C). The author states that the debate continues.
(E) is a comparison between two activities about which information relating to the comparison is not provided.

Just keep in mind that you're not supposed to be reading so much into these questions as your explanation earlier suggested.


#officialexplanation
 
debbie.d.park
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 21
Joined: August 09th, 2010
 
 
 

PT 55, S1, Q5 Many scientists believe that bipedal

by debbie.d.park Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:09 am

I am having some difficulties with this question.

After pondering between A and B, I chose A (forest environments being more hospitable than grassland), thinking that this could be inferred from the following in the stimulus:

... bipedalism also would have conferred substantial advantages upon early hominids who never left the forest - in gathering food found within standing reach of the forest floor ...

Well, now I can see that assuming "easier to gather food" equals "hospitable environment" does seem like a little too much of a stretch.

But why is B correct?

My reasoning behind dropping B was that early hominids, while developing their bipedal locomotion, left forest and moved to open grasslands, where food is not as easily found as their old habitat (if grasslands also offered plenty of food, why would the author use the word "substantial advantages" for not leaving the forest?). Although standing on two feet does make them locate food easily, when combined with environmental change factor, the net effect of helping gather food seemed somewhat less. Can you point out any logical mistakes I'm making?

I'd appreciate your guidance.
 
john
Thanks Received: 15
LSAT Geek
 
Posts: 24
Joined: November 19th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by john Fri May 06, 2011 3:43 pm

Here's my thoughts on it:

5. (B)
Question type: Inference


According to the passage, bipedalism allowed early hominids to look over tall grasses and thereby locate food. Also, hominids that remained in the forest could also gather food in standing reach through bipedalism. So, the passage clearly supports the statement that bipedal locomotion would have helped early hominids gather food.

(A) is out of scope because the passage offers no grounds for comparing forests and grasslands with regard to how hospitable they were.
(C) contradicts the passage’s indications that bipedalism was useful in open grasslands.
(D) engages in detail creep, altering the point that bipedalism evolved during the shift from forests to grasslands to the claim that it evolved solely in forests.
(E) is out of scope because the passage does not compare the importance of gathering food to that of avoiding predators.
 
irini101
Thanks Received: 1
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 49
Joined: August 30th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by irini101 Sun Sep 11, 2011 5:02 pm

Hello mshermn, I narrowed down to choice B and D ending up choose B out of gut feeling. I find both are flawed. I followed your explanation of D's flaw:

"(D) has a similar flaw to answer choice (C). The author states that the debate continues."

then I find B would also be flawed, since there are 3 theories of bipedal locomotion's origin in the stimulus:
response to migration from forest to grassland-help gather food;
response to continue living in the forest-help gather food;
response to better odds of finding mate;

Since the debate continues, we could not infer D--as it is only mentioned in the 2nd thoery, not all the three and the debate contines;

then by the same token, neither could we infer B--as gathering food is not mentioned in the 3rd theory, ONLY in the 1st and 2nd theory;

Then I find no correct answer in the choices. Could you please pinpoint the flaw in my understanding/thinking above?

Thanks a lot!
 
daniel.g.winter
Thanks Received: 10
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 16
Joined: June 20th, 2011
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by daniel.g.winter Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:31 pm

irini101 Wrote:Hello mshermn, I narrowed down to choice B and D ending up choose B out of gut feeling. I find both are flawed. I followed your explanation of D's flaw:

"(D) has a similar flaw to answer choice (C). The author states that the debate continues."

then I find B would also be flawed, since there are 3 theories of bipedal locomotion's origin in the stimulus:
response to migration from forest to grassland-help gather food;
response to continue living in the forest-help gather food;
response to better odds of finding mate;

Since the debate continues, we could not infer D--as it is only mentioned in the 2nd thoery, not all the three and the debate contines;

then by the same token, neither could we infer B--as gathering food is not mentioned in the 3rd theory, ONLY in the 1st and 2nd theory;

Then I find no correct answer in the choices. Could you please pinpoint the flaw in my understanding/thinking above?

Thanks a lot!


I think your problem is you are looking for a watertight answer when the question stem asks for "Most supported." This is not a "Must Be True" - it's a similar question type, but you can give it a little more leeway in the answer choices with respect to things that MUST happen. Out of all the choices, B is clearly the most supported, therefore it's correct. Hope that helps.
 
goriano
Thanks Received: 12
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 113
Joined: December 03rd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by goriano Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:23 pm

irini101 Wrote:Hello mshermn, I narrowed down to choice B and D ending up choose B out of gut feeling. I find both are flawed. I followed your explanation of D's flaw:

"(D) has a similar flaw to answer choice (C). The author states that the debate continues."

then I find B would also be flawed, since there are 3 theories of bipedal locomotion's origin in the stimulus:
response to migration from forest to grassland-help gather food;
response to continue living in the forest-help gather food;
response to better odds of finding mate;

Since the debate continues, we could not infer D--as it is only mentioned in the 2nd thoery, not all the three and the debate contines;

then by the same token, neither could we infer B--as gathering food is not mentioned in the 3rd theory, ONLY in the 1st and 2nd theory;

Then I find no correct answer in the choices. Could you please pinpoint the flaw in my understanding/thinking above?

Thanks a lot!


Also, even if bipedal locomotion evolved IN RESPONSE to better odds of finding a mate (theory #3), that doesn't preclude it from helping early hominids gather food, which is what (B) says.
 
ptewarie
Thanks Received: 36
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 38
Joined: October 01st, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by ptewarie Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:32 pm

Guys, don't overcomplicate. This is probably the easiest inference question I have seen on an LSAT.

Sentence 3 says " bipedialism would have conferred certain advantages upon early hominids(...)- in gathering food."

Answer choice B says this verbatim:
"Bipedal locomotion would have helped early hominids gather food".

How could this not be the right answer? Hope this helps.
 
ezraryu
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 5
Joined: September 24th, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by ezraryu Sat Nov 16, 2013 3:50 am

Hi guys, I have an idea for why the answer choice (D) goes against the argument:

The stimulus is more so leaning toward the possibility that the hominids who exclusively inhabited the forest environment were not bipedal. You can tell by the tone of the main conclusion that comes after "however" that this is the reason for the ongoing debate. To paraphrase the stimulus: the debate on the origins for the bipedal locomotion is still unresolved because, although the trait would have conferred substantial survival advantage (e.g. food gathering), not all hominids (such as the forest dwellers) shared the trait. Perhaps, there were other reasons, such as bettering the odds for finding a mate.
 
jeanlouisf
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 6
Joined: March 16th, 2014
 
 
 

Re: Q5 - Many scientists believe that bipedal

by jeanlouisf Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:40 am

The answer is B.

The author states no preference for either sides of the debate behind the origin of bipedalism. She also said something similar to "the debate continues".

The most we can say is that Bipedal Locomotion would have helped early hominids gather food, because we can be certain (according to the argument) that despite its origin, gathering food is a common factor agreed upon between scientist in this community.