Elizabeth.Naff
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 9
Joined: June 07th, 2012
 
 
 

Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by Elizabeth.Naff Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:08 pm

It's clear that Hudson is drawing an analogy, but how are these even analogous.

I threw the question because I couldn't see how the two arguments are parallel?

Anyone?
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by bbirdwell Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:43 am

Hey Elizabeth, I'm a little confused. If it's clear that he's drawing an analogy, why didn't just choose (A) and move on with things?

I mean, I agree that it's kind of an awkward analogy, but like you say, it's clear that it IS an analogy, and no other answer comes close to describing Hudson's response.

Just for grins, I'll try to describe the parallels:

Whittaker basically says "you can't say that something happened BEFORE something that never happened." You can't drop out before your second year of med school if your second year of med school never exists. (Whittaker might agree that it would be more correct to say that you dropped out after your first year)

Hudson then says: Well then I can't die BEFORE I make my first million (something can't be said to happen BEFORE something that never happened). Therefore I'm going to become rich (in other words, I'll have to make a million, because I HAVE to die).

Hope that helps!
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
 
Elizabeth.Naff
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 9
Joined: June 07th, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by Elizabeth.Naff Wed Sep 05, 2012 6:41 pm

Haha, thanks bbirdwell!

I was over-thinking the question. I thought it was one of those "half right, half wrong" answer choices.

The question really was as simple as it looked after all.

Thanks!
 
rpcuhk
Thanks Received: 5
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 41
Joined: May 02nd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by rpcuhk Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:25 am

bbirdwell Wrote:Hey Elizabeth, I'm a little confused. If it's clear that he's drawing an analogy, why didn't just choose (A) and move on with things?

I mean, I agree that it's kind of an awkward analogy, but like you say, it's clear that it IS an analogy, and no other answer comes close to describing Hudson's response.

Just for grins, I'll try to describe the parallels:

Whittaker basically says "you can't say that something happened BEFORE something that never happened." You can't drop out before your second year of med school if your second year of med school never exists. (Whittaker might agree that it would be more correct to say that you dropped out after your first year)

Hudson then says: Well then I can't die BEFORE I make my first million (something can't be said to happen BEFORE something that never happened). Therefore I'm going to become rich (in other words, I'll have to make a million, because I HAVE to die).

Hope that helps!



Hi Brain, I don't follow your explanation of the parallels. What is the parallel of W's "if they drop out" in H's analogy?

In H's argument, the "no such thing as ... before..." is the premise

In W's argument the "no such thing as...before..." is the conclusion

Thank you in advance
 
griffin.811
Thanks Received: 43
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 127
Joined: September 09th, 2012
 
 
 

Re: Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by griffin.811 Wed Sep 11, 2013 10:16 pm

What would Hudson's response look like had answer choice B been the correct answer?

Maybe a better way to phrase that is what would be an example of Hudson citing a specific example to counter W's claim.

Thanks
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by tommywallach Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:55 pm

Hey rpcuhk,

The parallel is "if you die, you don't make a million dollars."

As for you, Griffin, I tend to get nervous about hypotheticals. In this case, there is no way (B) could be write for this argument, because it's a silly, hypothetical point. A specific example simply couldn't exist!

-t

P.S. This question is the WORST.
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image
 
asafezrati
Thanks Received: 6
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 116
Joined: December 07th, 2014
 
 
 

Re: Q4 - Whittaker: There can be no

by asafezrati Fri Apr 10, 2015 2:44 pm

I don't get this analogy.

W says: the scenario of Drop before 2nd Year isn't possible.
H says: according to W, the scenario of Die before 1M$ (ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS!!!) is not possible.
So by the time I die I MUST have 1M$.

Is that the reasoning?