Q4

 
kmewmewblue
Thanks Received: 1
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 57
Joined: April 18th, 2011
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
 

Q4

by kmewmewblue Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:37 am

I think I am missing subtlety on last paragraph.
I actually thought (B) was strengthen the passage rather than counterexample....

Human Indicator focuses on domestic production of goods and improvements on human indicator. What's wrong?

Thanks in advance.
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
This post thanked 2 times.
 
 

Re: Q4

by ohthatpatrick Tue Nov 22, 2011 4:36 pm

I'm not sure I understood this sentence of yours:
"Human Indicator focuses on domestic production of goods and improvements on human indicator".

Let's clarify the two distinct measures of economic health:

GNP: value of goods produced divided by population

Human Indicators: nutrition, life expectancy, birth weight, infant mortality, resource availability, employment opportunities, education, clean water, medicine, etc.

How can we simplify the "views expressed in the last passage"?

1- some nations are deciding NOT to focus on GDP, but rather to focus on human indicators

2- they think that they need to shift their focus from GDP (material wealth) in order to protect/improve human indicators (well-being of the nation)

3- they realize that human indicators could do well, whether or not GNP goes down, goes up, or stays the same.

(B) is a counterexample to the 2nd point made here. (B) describes nations who focus on GNP and get improved human indicators. The nations in the last paragraph, by contrast, felt that they should NOT focus on GNP in order to get improvement in human indicators.

(A) focus on human indicators results in slower GNP -- this is consistent with the 3rd point

(C) focus on human indicators results in improved GNP - this is consistent with the 3rd point

(D) focus on human indicators results in improved GNP -- this is consistent with the 3rd point

(E) focus on GNP results in no improvement of human indicators -- this is consistent with the 1st and 2nd point

I hope this helps.
 
hyewonkim89
Thanks Received: 5
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 122
Joined: December 17th, 2012
 
 
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Q4

by hyewonkim89 Sun May 12, 2013 8:20 pm

Hello,

I'm having a hard time understanding where B is talking about GNP.

Is it "domestic production of goods" ??

Thanks in advance!
 
cyt5015
Thanks Received: 6
Elle Woods
Elle Woods
 
Posts: 75
Joined: June 01st, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q4

by cyt5015 Sat Jan 03, 2015 10:09 pm

hyewonkim89 Wrote:Hello,

I'm having a hard time understanding where B is talking about GNP.

Is it "domestic production of goods" ??

Thanks in advance!


Yes, see GNP's definition in the first paragraph.
User avatar
 
BridgetteC598
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 3
Joined: April 08th, 2021
 
 
 

Re: Q4

by BridgetteC598 Thu Apr 08, 2021 1:43 pm

@ohthatpatrick

Would you be willing to help me out and clarify where in the passage you gathered the info for the point you made in #3? "they realize that human indicators could do well, whether or not GNP goes down, goes up, or stays the same."

This question has tripped me up and i think it's because i still don't understand it fully.

Been following a few of your other replies here and your post helped me to greatly understand Sufficient Assumption questions the other day.

I appreciate your time!!

- Bridgette


ohthatpatrick Wrote:I'm not sure I understood this sentence of yours:
"Human Indicator focuses on domestic production of goods and improvements on human indicator".

Let's clarify the two distinct measures of economic health:

GNP: value of goods produced divided by population

Human Indicators: nutrition, life expectancy, birth weight, infant mortality, resource availability, employment opportunities, education, clean water, medicine, etc.

How can we simplify the "views expressed in the last passage"?

1- some nations are deciding NOT to focus on GDP, but rather to focus on human indicators

2- they think that they need to shift their focus from GDP (material wealth) in order to protect/improve human indicators (well-being of the nation)

3- they realize that human indicators could do well, whether or not GNP goes down, goes up, or stays the same.

(B) is a counterexample to the 2nd point made here. (B) describes nations who focus on GNP and get improved human indicators. The nations in the last paragraph, by contrast, felt that they should NOT focus on GNP in order to get improvement in human indicators.

(A) focus on human indicators results in slower GNP -- this is consistent with the 3rd point

(C) focus on human indicators results in improved GNP - this is consistent with the 3rd point

(D) focus on human indicators results in improved GNP -- this is consistent with the 3rd point

(E) focus on GNP results in no improvement of human indicators -- this is consistent with the 1st and 2nd point

I hope this helps.