What does the Question Stem tell us?
Explain Discrepancy (it looks like Strengthen until we see we're reading a paradox)
Break down the Stimulus:
Given that "Azedcorp owns a majority of THE DAILY and has stubbornly refused to sell", How could it be that "Morris WILL soon own THE DAILY"?
Any prephrase?
I'm not a stock expert, but if more shares were created and Morris bought those up, then maybe her number of shares could become the majority, even if Azedcorp kept all of theirs. Alternatively, mabye there's a reason Azedcorp would change its mind and agree to sell some shares.
Correct answer:
E
Answer choice analysis:
A) Who cares. We only care whether Azedcorp will sell its shares of the Daily (or if more shares will be created for Morris)
B) Maybe. This provides some incentive for Azedcorp selling its shares. However, is it clear that this extra money is enough to change Azedcorp's mind? (Also, it's possible that Azedcorp bought these shares many years ago. So ANYONE offering a respectable amount for the shares would be offering much more than what Azedcorp paid for them)
C) Doesn't help us explain why Azedcorp would change its mind. From what we know, there's no interest in selling shares.
D) Doesn't matter if Morris is #2. There's still no way to achieve a majority unless Azedcorp changes its mind and starts selling shares.
E) Sounds good! This is a the "reason Azedcorp would change its mind and agree to sell some shares".
Takeaway/Pattern: Though this looks like a Strengthen question, we're not strengthening an argument/reasoning, so you shouldn't be reading for an argument core. If you're strengthening a claim / prediction / hypothesis, you really just need some independent evidence that leans in favor of that idea being true. Here, we need something to overcome the counterweight of Azedcorp's stubborn refusal to sell its shares.
#officialexplanation