by Gerald Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:53 pm
PT65, S4, Q3 (Weaken).
Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the reasoning in the travel industry
consultant’s argument?
(A) Business travelers often make travel decisions based on whether they feel a given airline values their business.
(B) Some airlines have indicated that they will undertake alterations in seating space throughout the entire passenger area of their planes in the near future.
(C) Sleeping in comfort during long flights is not the primary concern of leisure travelers.
(D) A far greater proportion of an airline’s revenues is derived from business travelers than from leisure travelers.
(E) Most leisure travelers buy airline tickets only when fares are discounted.
(D) is correct
Weaken questions are assumption family questions where the task is to disrupt the logic supporting the author’s conclusion. Like all questions in the assumption family, we start by finding the conclusion. The conclusion here might be tough to spot at first, but we actually have a great conclusion flag word: "should." Anything that seems like a recommendation is usually a conclusion, and recommendations are often made with "should." What does the author recommend? That airlines focus on the comfort of leisure travelers rather than business passengers. Why does he make this recommendation? Because leisure travelers purchase 80% of all airline tickets. Our core looks like this:
Leisure travelers purchase 80% of all airline tickets --> Airlines should focus on comfort of leisure travelers (not business travelers)
Is this a solid recommendation? Of course not! Assumption family questions always have logic problems. Can we spot any issues here? Well, this is America, the capital of capitalism, so presumably the author’s recommendation is intended to maximize profits. Just because leisure travelers buy 80% of tickets, does that mean they’re more important than business travelers to airline profits?
And maybe the test-writer is from Sweden or something, so perhaps the recommendation is based on something other than profit maximization, but at the least our answer will have to give us a reason not to prefer leisure to business. Let’s keep this in mind as we hit the answer choices.
(A) Out of Scope. Who cares about the feelings of business travelers? Even if they took their business elsewhere, does this mean the airlines aren’t better off focusing on leisure travelers? No. Eliminate.
(B) This is kind of a premise booster. Great, some airlines can’t make up their minds and are improving seating throughout. Who cares? Our argument is about which class of passenger we should prefer (the leisure), not how we should hold hands, sing kumbaya, and all get along. Eliminate.
(C) Out of Scope. Sleeping? Who cares whether leisure travelers are concerned with comfort while sleeping, or how best to ignore that they’re in a flying missile suspended 35k ft above the earth? Does this give us any information about why we should value leisure travelers more or less than business travelers? No. Eliminate.
(E) This answer might be tempting, because it implies leisure travelers only buy cheap tickets. But the answer still doesn’t give us a reason to prefer one camp of travelers to the other. Perhaps business travelers also buy discounted seats.
That leaves (D): A far greater proportion of an airline’s revenues is derived from business travelers than from leisure travelers.
Aha! This looks a lot like our prediction. We wanted a reason to prefer business travelers to leisure, and this answer says we should prefer business travelers because they are responsible for most airline revenue. This was the capitalist route we expected our answer to take, that just because leisure travelers buy 80% of tickets doesn’t mean they account for most profits. Yay capitalism!