by demetri.blaisdell Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:22 am
Thanks for your question, nlynes. Be careful on spending too much time on the stimulus. This is an inference question, so we aren't looking for an argument core or a gap in the argument. But putting the stimulus in your own words is never a bad idea.
Stimulus: The best language users are the good writers. But, they use language differently from the rest of us.
The key part of the stimulus is where is says that great authors are less respectful of proper usage than "most of us are." You get that in (C) where it says that the most talented language users (the good writers) are less likely to observe proper language usage.
The wrong answers:
(A) is out of scope. The stimulus tells us nothing about how to become a great writer.
(B) is also out of scope. It's almost a reversal. We have no idea if the great writers became great because they already had a weird style or if writing a certain way caused them to write in a weirder and weirder style.
(D) isn't in the stimulus either. Criticism?
(E) seems backwards. Actually, the best users of the language are the ones who are being called idiosyncratic. So clearly, they aren't setting the standards.
I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions.
Demetri