What does the Question Stem tell us?
ID the Conclusion
Break down the Stimulus:
Conclusion: It makes some sense to talk about musical knowledge growing over time.
Evidence: We know more about certain sounds now compared to 500 years ago. We discovered options for certain sounds that previous composers didn't have (so they avoided those certain sounds).
Any prephrase?
Whenever you're doing an ID the Conclusion question, remind your brain that the Conclusion will almost always be in one of two places: 1. The 1st sentence (and the rest of the argument unpacks that claim) 2. The author's rebuttal to some person/claim/idea (usually prefaced by "but/yet/however". This one is a #1. The first sentence is an opinion that gets unpacked over the rest of the paragraph.
Correct answer:
E
Answer choice analysis:
A) Premise
B) Never said. "Consonant" DOES mean appealing, but there is no contrast between how old vs. modern listeners would perceive this sound differently. More importantly, this is not the first sentence, so it's not the conclusion.
C) Counterpoint
D) Example from the Counterpoint
E) 1st sentence. Boom!
Takeaway/Pattern: When you prime your brain with the expectation that there's a 50% chance the FIRST sentence will actually be the conclusion, you're more receptive to hearing it as an opinion. And if you hear it as an opinion, read the following sentences with the expectation that the author is going to try to convince you of that first sentence. Once we identify the opinion in the 2nd half of the first sentence as the Conclusion, we can ignore the 1st half of the first sentence. We don't care about counterpoints that authors present in concessions (f.e. "although [conceding a point], here's my actual thought.")
#officialexplanation