by noah Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:19 pm
When you post a question, please type in the first 5 words as they appear in questions into the bar - it'll make it easier for future users of the forum to find questions. Thanks! (I edited this one for you).
The conclusion of this argument is that people have perfect pitch because of genetics. Why? Because folks who have it generally have relatives that do, and folks that don't have it, generally don't have relatives that do.
Compelling argument? Imagine you have perfect pitch because your parents made you sing songs before every dinner. If you have a sibling, it stands to reason that he or she also is singing those songs and learning perfect pitch.
In short, couldn't there be another reason (other than genetics) that explains why relatives tend to share having or not having perfect pitch.
The specific version of this that (A) addresses is that folks who have relatives with perfect pitch might tend to get lessons in music more often than others, perhaps helping them too get perfect pitch. If this were true, that might be the reason that family members share perfect pitch. (A) strengthens the argument by assuring us that there is NOT this other cause. If you need to strengthen a causal argument, it's useful to "block" other possible causes.
(B) is out of scope.
(C) is about what folks do with their pitch - this has no apparent effect on relatives.
(D) is tempting but it is the opposite of what we want! This establishes another cause for family members sharing perfect pitch.
(E) is tempting but there's no connection to family members here. If anything, this weakens the argument by bringing up other causes for perfect pitch.