by TilP164 Thu Jan 14, 2021 7:42 am
I narrowed it down to A and B, initially chose B but then switched to A.
I interpreted A as saying: no matter how they alter the manufacturing process, the fabric will inevitably wrinkle. The belief in the passage is that, even had the manufacturing of glass during the medieval period been perfect, the glass will inevitably bulge in the aftermath, there is nothing we could do about it during the manufacturing process.
Now we know we COULD solve the bulge problem by altering the manufacturing process to make the glass more even to begin with.
For B, I didn't like the word flaw. For people who consider the thickening of glass as a natural property of the material, then it is not a flaw, but rather a phenomenon. Besides, the passage made no mention that this observation compromised the functions of the glass in any way, but you would expect a flawed pottery to be compromised.
Am I overthinking this? Where is the mistake in my thinking?