User avatar
 
WaltGrace1983
Thanks Received: 207
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 837
Joined: March 30th, 2013
 
 
trophy
Most Thanked
trophy
Most Thankful
trophy
First Responder
 

Q26 - Modern navigation systems

by WaltGrace1983 Sat Jan 17, 2015 4:31 pm

Odd stem: we are to find the one that LEAST strengthens the argument.

    Passenger turned on laptop computer and plane veered off course/had dimming dials on navigation system
    -->
    Navigation systems are being put at risk by electronics (laptops, cassettes) that passengers bring on board


This is a pretty standard correlation (laptop being turned on) / causation (dimming dials) argument. We are probably looking for something that said that the laptop actually caused the dimming dials. Also, we might want to take special note of the broadening of scope in the conclusion: cassettes were not mentioned in the stimulus so how can we infer, from a premise about just laptops, that other electronics are doing the same thing?

(A) Absence of cause, absence of effect. Strengthens.

(B) ALL electronic devices emit radiation. This addresses the special note I addressed above. Strengthens.

(C) Just like (A). Strengthens.

(D) This is not the greatest strengthener as it doesn't actually show that the laptop caused the dimming dials. However, it does show that electronics can cause radio interference. Keep this for now.

(E) This has no relevance to the argument and it DEFINITELY doesn't address causation so this strengthens much less than (D) does. Eliminate (D) and choose (E), the correct answer.
 
Aquamarine
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 43
Joined: August 21st, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q26 - Modern navigation systems

by Aquamarine Tue Jun 30, 2015 12:15 pm

I chose D but the answer is E. I still don't understand why E is an answer.
If planes were first equipped with low-power circuitry "at about the same time" as portable electric devices got popular, can it be strengthening the stimulus?
Being at the "same time" made me think there're no other possibilities which could weaken the stimulus.

Can anyone explain why D can't be an answer and E can?
Thanks!
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q26 - Modern navigation systems

by tommywallach Tue Jun 30, 2015 8:36 pm

Hey Aqua,

Hm. Not sure I understand your question, or how it isn't answered by Walt's post. (D) creates a POSSIBLE cause. As Walt says, it's not a great strengthener, but it's possible. (E) is TOTALLY irrelevant (doesn't strengthen at all), so it's the better answer. Things happening at the same time does not establish causality.

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image