b91302310
Thanks Received: 13
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 153
Joined: August 30th, 2010
 
 
 

Q25 - Sasha: Handwriting analysis should

by b91302310 Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:48 pm

For (C), I don't quite understand what it means by "restricting the class to which it is to be applied". Could anyone explain it?

Thanks!
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q25 - Sasha: Handwriting analysis should

by bbirdwell Fri Oct 01, 2010 6:38 pm

You mean (B), I guess?

Tough choices! At first glance, perhaps they all seem bad.

(B) The word "principle" is a bit uncomfortable here. I would look back to see which statement it is that he "defends," or, in other words, supports. His argument basically looks like this:

p: The use of handwriting analysts is problematic, but only because there is no licensing board.

c: When there's a board, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be legitimate.

This last part is what is meant by "restricting" the class. He defends the idea that handwriting analysis is legitimate by "restricting" that legitimacy to licensed analysts, as opposed to saying that all analysts are legitimate.
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm