by aradunakhor Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:19 pm
Could someone explain why D is covered by a faculty-oriented approach? I know the last paragraph mentions that it is assumed researchers own their IP, except if the development is public health related. However, why are we justified in assuming that they instead become university property? Isn't it there a good chance that public health developments fall under basic science research, which should not be patentable/commercially exploited. They're a scientific discovery which is a public good.
I know B is too extreme with its 'under any circumstances' condition to be covered by a faculty-oriented approach (the closest one), but D seems to me to be just as unlikely to be covered by it.