Q24

 
hippo3717
Thanks Received: 1
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 25
Joined: October 12th, 2012
 
 
 

Q24

by hippo3717 Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:48 am

someone please check my work:

A) Maximalist would allow
B) First half is right but the second half is wrong
C) Superamaximalist would allow
D) Faculty-oriented would allow
E) same as D
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by maryadkins Wed Nov 21, 2012 11:10 am

Well done except that I don't see how the first part of (B) is right. Are you saying it's allowed under the faculty-oriented model? "All their inventions" is too extreme. I don't see (B) being covered in any part by the FO model.
 
aradunakhor
Thanks Received: 0
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 24
Joined: June 07th, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by aradunakhor Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:19 pm

Could someone explain why D is covered by a faculty-oriented approach? I know the last paragraph mentions that it is assumed researchers own their IP, except if the development is public health related. However, why are we justified in assuming that they instead become university property? Isn't it there a good chance that public health developments fall under basic science research, which should not be patentable/commercially exploited. They're a scientific discovery which is a public good.

I know B is too extreme with its 'under any circumstances' condition to be covered by a faculty-oriented approach (the closest one), but D seems to me to be just as unlikely to be covered by it.
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by maryadkins Tue Sep 10, 2013 2:19 pm

The context of the passage as a whole is about faculty ownership versus institutional ownership. That provides the support for there being institutional ownership in the absence of faculty ownership.
 
olaizola.mariana
Thanks Received: 2
Elle Woods
Elle Woods
 
Posts: 52
Joined: May 12th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by olaizola.mariana Sun Jul 19, 2015 10:14 pm

I agree with aradunakhor and am not convinced by maryadkins' explanation. Why should we assume that all public health interventions become the property of the institution? I would argue that a more realistic scenario in the real world would have those public health interventions become free of exclusive ownership. Why else would there be a special exception for public health?

In the end I was torn between (B) and (D) and chose (D) because I was able to locate the relevant part of the passage faster and see that there was lack of support for it.

Please shed some more light!
User avatar
 
maryadkins
Thanks Received: 641
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1261
Joined: March 23rd, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by maryadkins Fri Jul 31, 2015 8:29 am

Thanks for the follow up! It was interesting to do a deeper dig on this.

On a second read, I think (D) Is also covered by the first of the four models—under the supermaximalist institution (line 27), which "stakes out the broadest possible claim," (D) would be covered for sure. (Note that it doesn't say either ONLY public health inventions or that the inventions are institution-owned BECAUSE they're public health related, only that they are institution owned.)
 
olaizola.mariana
Thanks Received: 2
Elle Woods
Elle Woods
 
Posts: 52
Joined: May 12th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q24

by olaizola.mariana Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:15 pm

I see now, thank you!