This was a sneaky one between "A" and "E".
"A" in itself does prevent F/H from ever going together because I goes twice and if G can't go with I then all 3 slots in the bottom row are taken, forcing FH to split.
However, on review, it turns out that "A" is too restrictive since originally, G and I could go together as :
G I H
I F/H G
== == ==
M S T
"E" does what "A" does by ensuring all three bottom slots are always filled out by either Is or Gs and hence FH can't go together but at the same time allows for G I to go together, a hypothetical case that never showed up in the questions ( i think) to trick students into picking "A".
Would you have pre phased something for this question because it seems like this question would have been easier if we had a rough idea on what we are looking for to force the same interaction. In review, I am thinking I should have gone into the question thinking of ways we can ensure F and H to split such as filling in the bottom slots or tie F/H with a different elements. Now that I look back in review this questions seems really "obvious" why A and E are the top contenders because of what they do to the bottom row but do you think there is anything we can do before a question to have such an inference ? For the actual question I just tested out answer choices; however, picked "A" without realizing it was too restrictive