I found this game relatively easy but ran out of time on the last two questions so I didn't get to them, but as I'm reviewing this question I'm having a hard time seeing how (C) and (E) are possible?
The rules state that:
1. Either Frank is assigned to Raimes and Kevin is assigned to Thompson, or Frank is not assigned to Raimes and Kevin is not assigned to Thompson.
and then follows with
2. Kevin is not assigned to Thompson.
which would mean that Frank is not assigned to Raimes. But even with rule #2 alone, saying that Kevin is not assigned to Thompson, how can question #22 which is asking which CANNOT be a complete assignment to the Thompson case include two answers where Kevin is assigned to the Thompson case?
If the second rule is saying that Kevin can't be on T, then how does #22 have two answers that say it can?