by ohthatpatrick Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:17 pm
Hey, Elizabeth. Sorry for the long delay (I was on a weeklong vacation)
For all "which must be true" questions like Q21, I first start by looking at all the previous scenarios I've done to see if I can find a counterexample to each answer choice.
For example, I would be asking myself these questions:
(A) Could there be no G's in 1, 2, or 3?
(B) Could there be no G's in 5 or 6?
(C) Could there be no R's in 1, 2, or 3?
(D) Could there be no R's in 5 or 6?
(E) Could there be no W's in 1, 2, or 3?
I do all my "if" questions before I do unconditional questions, so I would also be pulling from my scenarios in Q22 and Q23.
I'm not going to re-create all the work I would have had for Q18, 19, 22, and 23, but I would have probably been able to kill at least a couple answers using those scenarios.
Instead, I'll just show you, in a vacuum, how you can eliminate the four wrong answers.
(A) Could there be no G's in 1, 2, or 3?
(B) Could there be no G's in 5 or 6? Sure. G W R R R R
(C) Could there be no R's in 1, 2, or 3? Sure. G W W R R R
(D) Could there be no R's in 5 or 6? Sure. G W R R G G
(E) Could there be no W's in 1, 2, or 3? Sure. G G G W R R
We can pick (A), since we found legal counterexamples to the other four answers.
Why does there HAVE to be a G in 1, 2, or 3?
Well, if we're not using G's, we're using R's or W's.
We can't put any R's in 1, 2, or 3, since we have to play a G before we're allowed to use any R's (rule 2).
We can't fill up spots 1, 2, and 3 with W's, since there have to be more R's than W's, so there would have to be 4 R's to outweigh those 3 W's.
Make sense?