User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q2 - An unstable climate was probably

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Fri Dec 31, 1999 8:00 pm

Question Type:
Strengthen

Stimulus Breakdown:
We start off with our conclusion, stating that an unstable climate was probably a major cause of the fall of Rome. Why? Well, there were extreme climate fluctuations during that time period, which surely hurt food production, which made it harder to rule/defend Rome.

Answer Anticipation:
As we often see in strengthen/weaken questions, we have causality. In this case, it's definitely a correlation/causation flaw. However, interestingly, we have an intermediate conclusion, stating that the climate hurt food production. We know this is intermediate because it builds off of the correlation, but also because of the "surely" in there, which denotes this as something the author believes, not something the author is asserting as definitively true (like the tree-ring analysis).

Since we have causality, we should expect the correct answer to either eliminate an alternative cause to the collapse; show a time when a stable climate didn't result in bad agriculture or societal collapse; or another example of climate issues creating agricultural or societal problems.

Correct Answer:
D

Answer Choice Analysis:
(A) Opposite. This weakens the argument by reversing the cause.

(B) Opposite. This weakens the argument by providing cause without effect.

(C) Opposite. This weakens the argument by providing an alternative cause for the intermediate conclusion.

(D) This answer choice supports an intermediate conclusion in the causal reasoning chain by providing no cause no effect for the causal assumption that poor food production could be caused by bad weather.

(E) Opposite, if anything. Food production being higher in 550A.D. would, if anything, make it harder to argue that the climate led to bad food production, resulting in the decline.

Takeaway/Pattern: Many strengthen questions feature causality, and there are set ways to strengthen it (eliminate an alternative cause; no cause, no effect; another example of cause with effect). Here, the focus ends up being on the intermediate conclusion (connecting weather to food), but it still shows us an example of an answer choice that strengthens a causal argument by showing a time without the cause that also didn't have the effect.

#officialexplanation
 
brian_trujillo
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: May 31st, 2016
 
 
 

Q2 - An unstable climate was probably

by brian_trujillo Mon Sep 12, 2016 6:38 pm

June 2016 LSAT, Section 3 Q2

I went with B on my original test, some time later I am studying and went with B again. Now I understand why D is a much better answer. But if I am being honest, and this is a vice, I did not event get to read D. I was anticipating that to strengthen the argument I would rule out an alt. cause and B just jumped out at me. In retrospect B is more problematic than not. Can anyone provide another perspective as to why B is totally wrong?
 
vstoever
Thanks Received: 3
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 22
Joined: March 02nd, 2017
 
 
 

Re: Q2 - An unstable climate was probably

by vstoever Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:01 pm

brian_trujillo Wrote:June 2016 LSAT, Section 3 Q2

I went with B on my original test, some time later I am studying and went with B again. Now I understand why D is a much better answer. But if I am being honest, and this is a vice, I did not event get to read D. I was anticipating that to strengthen the argument I would rule out an alt. cause and B just jumped out at me. In retrospect B is more problematic than not. Can anyone provide another perspective as to why B is totally wrong?


D is wrong because it says instability rather than stability.

If the areas had the MOST climatic instability, but they didn't have any more unrest than usual, this weakens the argument that the climate instability caused unrest. If it had said it had the most climatic stability with little unrest, it would have strengthened.