So we're told:
-if the universities were meeting moral and intellectual responsibilities, bestsellers in uni bookstores wouldn't be frivolous
-but they are frivolous at most uni bookstores
nbayar1212 Wrote:Can we conclude that most universities aren't meeting their moral responsibilities instead of just that some aren't meeting them?
Yes! (E) is just a softer version of this inference, would which also be correct.
(A) is about the wrong subjects; we're talking about the universities' moral responsibilities, not the people who buy the publications.
(B) is about "carrying" the publications but we were never told they can't carry them. It's a matter of what's selling best.
(C) isn't supported. Just because at most bookstores the bestsellers are these magazines doesn't mean most PEOPLE who go to the bookstores are purchasing them. Maybe most of the people are visiting the other bookstores.
(D) like (A) and (C) isn't about the bookstores and we're talking about the bookstores, not the people.