Laura Damone
Thanks Received: 94
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 468
Joined: February 17th, 2011
 
 
 

Q17 - Traditional hatcheries raise fish in featureless envir

by Laura Damone Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:25 pm

Question Type:
Necessary Assumption

Stimulus Breakdown:
Conclusion: fish raised in the experimental hatcheries are more likely to survive after release. Premises: the experimental hatcheries expose fish to more visual stimulation and varied routines as compared to traditional hatcheries. When released, fish from experimental hatcheries are bolder in exploring new environments and trying new foods.

Answer Anticipation:
There's a big gap here between being bolder and being more likely to survive. We can predict either a bridge assumption that links the two concepts (fish that are bolder are more likely to survive) or a defender assumption that defends against an objection to this link up (going into new environments and eating new foods doesn't make fish more likely to die).

Correct answer:
C

Answer choice analysis:
(A) This is a classic trap answer for Necessary Assumption questions. The economic feasibility of a course of action is almost never necessary to assume. Consider the negation of this one: it's not economically feasible. Who cares? That just means the experimental hatcheries aren't a model for the future of commercial hatcheries.

(B) Does this have to be true in order to conclude that there's something else effecting their survival rate too (the hatchery they're from)? Nope. Eliminate.

(C) Does this one have to be true? Hard to say, maybe, so negate to be sure. What if no fish from traditional hatcheries ever die because of their foraging timidness. Well, if that's true, then how can we conclude that the fish from experimental hatcheries have a survival advantage just because they're bolder? We can't, so this negation ruins the argument, making it the correct answer.

(D) The degree of this one is troubling: "need to eat" and "many different types" make this an unlikely candidate. To see why, negate: one hatchery-raised fish can survive eating only a few types of food. Does that blow up our argument? Nope. Remember, when negating a conditional statement, just raise the possibility of a non-conforming case. If that non-conforming case doesn't ruin the argument, the answer is wrong.

(E) Another conditional, so negate with a non-conforming case! If one fish in the wild lives in a visually boring environment, does that ruin our argument? No way.

Takeaway/Pattern:
There are a lot of ways a necessary assumption can be phrased, so don't freak out if you make a solid prediction but don’t see it among the answer choices. Work wrong to right, keeping an eye out for classic traps and degree issues (A, D, and E), and stay focused on the exact task of the question. Ask yourself "does this really need to be true of the argument to work?" If the answer is no, eliminate (B). If you're not sure, negate.

#officialexplanation
Laura Damone
LSAT Content & Curriculum Lead | Manhattan Prep
 
Wenjin
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 12
Joined: December 23rd, 2018
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - Traditional hatcheries raise fish in featureless envir

by Wenjin Thu Nov 21, 2019 1:37 pm

Would D be a better answer if it addresses “ new food” instead of “different types of food”?
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - Traditional hatcheries raise fish in featureless envir

by ohthatpatrick Mon Nov 25, 2019 5:54 pm

Agreed. They don't need to have a diet of many foods at once, but the implication is they may need to be willing to try a food source that wasn't previously one they had used.

"need" is still too strong. This is just supposed to aid in their survival, not be necessary to it.

If it said
"hatchery-raised fish have a better chance of surviving if they try more new types of food"
it seems legit
 
ZhengL938
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 5
Joined: July 14th, 2018
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - Traditional hatcheries raise fish in featureless envir

by ZhengL938 Mon Dec 23, 2019 10:26 pm

Would answer choice (B) be a better one if it said "The quality of the envoronments into which hatchery-raised fish are released does not have significant effect on the fish's survival rate "?

Thanks!
 
StratosM31
Thanks Received: 0
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 31
Joined: January 03rd, 2020
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - Traditional hatcheries raise fish in featureless envir

by StratosM31 Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:01 pm

ZhengL938 Wrote:Would answer choice (B) be a better one if it said "The quality of the envoronments into which hatchery-raised fish are released does not have significant effect on the fish's survival rate "?

Thanks!


I don't think so.

We have no information regarding what kind of environments the wild fish are released to and whether there is a difference among their quality. Therefore, we can't make any statement regarding whether it is a necessary assumption or not.

Assuming it does have a significant effect: so what? It could be the case that all fish, from both traditional and experimental hatcheries, are released to the same environment, or to environments with exactly the same quality. In that case (which we are allowed to assume, since there is no information given about it), the assumption would not be necessary.

To be honest, I chose exactly this option (B) when I took this PT b/c I didn't know what timid means (English is not my first language) :lol: :lol: