Celeste757
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 18
Joined: January 22nd, 2011
 
 
 

Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by Celeste757 Thu May 05, 2011 11:35 am

Hello,

I got this one down to B and C. I picked C, which is correct, but that was a guess. I don't really understand the difference between the 2, it seems to me they are saying the same exact thing. I picked C because it had the word "ratio" in it, and the example gave numbers, but i am assuming there is a reason why B itself is WRONG.

thanks!!
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by bbirdwell Fri May 06, 2011 4:20 pm

Nowhere is there any evidence to suggest that angioplasty is the ONLY treatment for clogged arteries. It simply says that angioplasty is "a technique."
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
 
sbuzzetto10
Thanks Received: 10
Forum Guests
 
Posts: 32
Joined: October 19th, 2010
 
 
 

Re: Q12 - hummingbird

by sbuzzetto10 Tue May 24, 2011 11:49 am

I also had trouble with this question..I was between A and D. I eliminated C because only 3 different species were given to illustrate the proposition and C seemed way too broad a claim to make based on only 3 bird species. Could someone please explain this?

Also, I believe the response bbirdwell gave is to section 4, number 12. I posted under this question because it said "hummingbird" although the correct number is section 2, number 17.
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - hummingbirds

by bbirdwell Wed May 25, 2011 1:40 am

Right you are! I've corrected the post heading... Thanks!

First of all, I recommend getting really familiar with the question types. This question type is asking for a proposition, or principle, based on the info in the argument. That means our job is to derive something general from something specific. Knowing this, we can see that "broad" answers will often be correct, because that's sort of the task we're being asked to perform -- extrapolate and broaden.

So here's the pattern we're given:

hummingbird egg = 15% of adult weight
goose egg = 4% of adult weight
ostrich egg = 1.6% of adult weight

What general principle is at work here? The bigger the bird, the proportionately smaller the egg, and vice versa: the smaller the bird, proportionately larger the egg.

(A) we might leave this one on a first pass.
(B) incorrect - the eggs are proportionately heavier, not "heavier and larger"
(C) leave
(D) eliminate. "little effect?" We have no evidence here whatsoever to suggest what "effect" the egg is having on the adult.
(E) eliminate. we don't know whether this is true.

So we're down to (A) and (C) on our first pass. Let's take a closer look.

What do know about the ratio of volume to weight of the eggs? Nothing! We only know about the ratio of adult weight to egg weight. Egg volume is never mentioned. Eliminate (A).
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
User avatar
 
Crogati
Thanks Received: 2
Jackie Chiles
Jackie Chiles
 
Posts: 32
Joined: January 12th, 2013
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by Crogati Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:28 pm

Could (B) be the right answer if it said:

"The smaller and lighter the average adult members of a bird species are, the larger (rather than larger and heavier) the eggs of that species are."


Thanks!
 
foralexpark
Thanks Received: 2
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 24
Joined: June 08th, 2013
 
 
trophy
First Responder
 

Re: Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by foralexpark Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:01 pm

Crogati Wrote:Could (B) be the right answer if it said:

"The smaller and lighter the average adult members of a bird species are, the larger (rather than larger and heavier) the eggs of that species are."


Thanks!


I don't think it works, since we don't know anything about the size of the eggs.

maybe an egg of an ostrich is as small as pea, but it weights a ton
User avatar
 
tommywallach
Thanks Received: 468
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 1041
Joined: August 11th, 2009
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by tommywallach Thu Oct 17, 2013 4:32 pm

Hey Crogati,

Foralex is correct here. Even if (B) said that, the passage doesn't support it, primarily because we haven't been told anything about the overall size of eggs, only the weight of them.

-t
Tommy Wallach
Manhattan LSAT Instructor
twallach@manhattanprep.com
Image
 
danielznelson
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 6
Joined: June 27th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by danielznelson Tue Sep 22, 2015 11:07 pm

I don’t understand “C” because it claims that the ratio of egg weight to adult member weight is smaller for larger birds than for smaller ones.

But isn’t a smaller ratio something like 2:1 compared to 4:1? With this, the answer choice should be reading the opposite.

Obviously, I’m missing something here, but what is it?
 
LaurenL251
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 7
Joined: October 03rd, 2019
 
 
 

Re: Q17 - The tiny hummingbird weighs

by LaurenL251 Wed Apr 29, 2020 3:16 pm

Hi everyone!

I am just really confused about the idea of ratios in this sense. I thought ratios were like 2:3 (two boys to every 3 girls in a classroom). We are only given the percent. How do we translate that to a ratio if I don't know the given weight of a hummingbird, goose, or ostrich?

Hummingbird weight: 0.12 oz
Goose weight: 11 lbs
Ostrich weight: 220 lbs

Hummingbird egg weight (15%): .018 oz
Goose egg weight (4%): .44 lbs
Ostrich egg weight (1.6%): 3.52 lbs


The ratio of egg weight to body weight is smaller for larger birds than for smaller ones. What does smaller mean in this sense? Does it means the egg weight is closer to the body weight for smaller birds than larger birds? As in the gap between the two weights is smaller?

Hummingbird ratio: .018 : 0.12 which can become 1.8/12 or 396/2640
Ostrich ratio: 3.52 : 220 which can become 3.52/220 or 42/2460

So, from this we can see that the Ostrich (larger bird) has a smaller ratio than the Hummingbird (smaller bird). I know I did way too much, and it could all be wrong. I just don't understand how someone can figure this out without doing the math...HELP?! :shock:

Any help would be amazing!
Thank you!