by JenniferK632 Sat Aug 08, 2020 4:24 pm
I initially got this question right. Then, during blind review, I picked B, second-guessing myself.
I guess my review was really perfectly blind. Does anyone have strategies for combating this?
Initially, I had decided against B because it spoke only about museums, when the communal property principle could be applied elsewhere. Then, during my blind review, "background of litigation" seemed to be describing paragraph two, and I ruled it out.