patrice.antoine Wrote:"Inspiring modernist creators of abstract art" somehow means the same thing as "develop modernism"? Would an instructor please explain.
I would actually say that, as you wrote it, it
does sound a little off. However, the answer choice is actually saying that "Cezanne's work
helped to develop modernism." This is a pretty critical distinction because
developing something and
helping to develop something IS a big difference.
What do we know? We know that Cezanne's art (his work) inspired the next generation of artists. Who are these next generation artists? They were 20th century modernists who created abstract art. If these artists who created modernist art were
inspired by Cezanne, we could probably say that Cezanne had a part - if even a little part - of helping
to develop modernism.
(C) is not completely supported; it is not 100% fact. However, it is most strongly supported from the answer choices given.
I picked
(E) but I realize now why its wrong. Cachin says that Cezanne is not an early modernist. Cachin thinks that people often view Cezanne's art from a modern point of view. Now (E) says that "Cezanne's work tends to
misinterpreted as modernist." The problem is that Cachin may not be right. In fact, if "most experts" believe him to be wrong, we might even venture to say that Cachin is most likely
wrong! Thus, while (E) is certainly tempting, it stretches a little bit too far.
(E) would have been right if it swapped "misinterpreted" for simply "interpreted," no?