by kbishop Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:10 pm
On my first reading of the passage, there seemed to only be a large disconnect between the first two sentences and the remainder. So Question 15 got me, too.
I chose (E) because the passage included multiple references to the debate as to the centrality of Valdez toward actos and theater. But that discussion seems to be far more relevant to the third sentence of the passage, not the second, so (E) should be incorrect. For a clearer reason why (E) is wrong, that sentence neither mentions Valdez, theater, nor historians.
(D) is a tempting answer, but the passage is about the development of Mexican-American theater, not about how historians have treated its development.
Upon re-reading the passage, I believe that the rationale that LSAC wanted to test that leads to (A) is the claim:
"if Chaves and the United Farm Works Union had not acted, then Valdez and the actos would not have...." something, either been developed at all, or not become significant. In other words, the strikes, according to the passage, were a critical cause of Valdez to create the actos genre, and a source of their subject matter.