Q14

 
xiahong0
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 5
Joined: March 22nd, 2010
 
 
 

Q14

by xiahong0 Sat May 22, 2010 10:13 pm

Hey Brian,

I pretty much have the exact same model and got every question right except number 14. What I'm having trouble with is perhaps the wording of the problem. The correct answer is C, but I can't understand why it isn't possible for F to be in the third slot. Yes, it's true that the third slot has to be 10, and the only 10, but why can't F be there? I don't see anywhere that states that F can't have discovered stuff in both the 9th and 10th centuries, so it seems possible that F could be in the third slot. This also seems plausible to me since it doesn't say anywhere that all three archaeologists must be used. For example, question 17's right answer is D (4). That would imply that we'd have 4 Fs and only one slot left for either G or O. I'm really confused on this one. Any help would be appreciated.
User avatar
 
bbirdwell
Thanks Received: 864
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 803
Joined: April 16th, 2009
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: PT 44, S3, G3 A tour group visits...

by bbirdwell Mon May 24, 2010 9:19 am

You've forgotten one of the constraints!!
"Exactly one site by G, and it's from the 10th."

The question says "exactly one site is from the 10th century." Sp that one has to be G.
I host free online workshop/Q&A sessions called Zen and the Art of LSAT. You can find upcoming dates here: http://www.manhattanlsat.com/zen-and-the-art.cfm
 
sarahcferrara
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 1
Joined: January 20th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q14

by sarahcferrara Mon Mar 09, 2015 10:04 pm

Hi birdwell,

I had trouble wrapping my brain around the wording of this question. Is it essentially adding another constraint? Is it now saying that there is only one 10th century site out of five sites? Is that why F can't be the 3rd site because it has to be G?

thanks,
Sarah
 
yvetterc23
Thanks Received: 0
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 3
Joined: January 25th, 2015
 
 
 

Re: Q14

by yvetterc23 Fri Mar 13, 2015 12:45 am

Your right it is adding a contraint. For this question there is only one site that's 10th century. Three HAS TO BE 10, be a more recent site than 4. Since G has one site and its from the 10th century, that removes F.

So yes to your question. Hope this helped.
User avatar
 
rinagoldfield
Thanks Received: 309
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 390
Joined: December 13th, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q14

by rinagoldfield Sat Mar 14, 2015 9:41 pm

yvetterc23, I think you answered Sarah's question perfectly.

To backtrack a bit: we know the fourth site must be visited in the 9th century because it's not discovered by O (so, no 8) and it has to be older than the third site (so, no 10).

If the fourth site is 9, then the third site has to be 10. This is because third site must be newer than the fourth.

So, in general, the third site is 10. This question tells us that ONLY the third site is 10. Therefore, this site must have been discovered by G.

--Rina