Question Type: Main Conclusion
Conclusion: The financial saving involved in using ASA over TPA must also be weighte against such considerations (such considerations is borrowed language from the premise which states the relatives of the patients who die simply because they were given the less expensive medicine would be particularly grieved)
A) isn't the conclusion is unsupported by the arguement (extreme word NEVER)
B) Seems just to be stating a fact already stated in the background part of the arguement
D) Seems to be stating another fact that is stated in the background part of the arguement
E) is the answer I choose but correct me if I'm wrong but I think the reason this is a wrong answer is because it's more of a premise booster than actually stating the main conclusion?
C) Is the right answer but I'm confused because I thought the conclusion was about a need to look at more than just the financial savings involved in using ASA but this answer choice is looking at TPA instead.