is C wrong because the last sentence "are likely to be paid late"? otherwise i cannot see how C could be wrong.
many thanks!
LSAT Forum
2 postsPage 1 of 1
-
- Nina
-
Thanks Received: 0
-
Atticus Finch
- Posts: 103
- Joined: October 15th, 2012
-
- maryadkins
-
Thanks Received: 641
-
Atticus Finch
- Posts: 1261
- Joined: March 23rd, 2011
- This post thanked 1 time.
Re: Q13 - No projects that involve historical
We can diagram this argument:
Involves hist rest --> No permit
Some of S&S projects involve hist rest --> some not granted permits
It works!
(C) says:
New member --> No paperwork
Paid --> paperwork
Some new members --> won't get paid
This is also a good argument but the problem with it is that the structure is different. Notice that (C) gives you two absolute conditional statements whereas our argument just gives you one, then tells you that there are "some" items that fall into it.
Make sense?
Involves hist rest --> No permit
Some of S&S projects involve hist rest --> some not granted permits
It works!
(C) says:
New member --> No paperwork
Paid --> paperwork
Some new members --> won't get paid
This is also a good argument but the problem with it is that the structure is different. Notice that (C) gives you two absolute conditional statements whereas our argument just gives you one, then tells you that there are "some" items that fall into it.
Make sense?
2 posts Page 1 of 1