by bbirdwell Wed May 02, 2012 2:47 am
(A) is a tricky inference, but totally true. It's a common tactic on the LSAT to infer in the "negative space" of a fact.
For example, if I tell you all about a crunchy, small, sweet treat and say, "in Mexico, they call this a galleta," I am suggesting that these treats exist in other places, where they might even be called by other names ("...whereas in the US, they call it a cookie"). Otherwise, I wouldn't need to say "in Mexico." I'd just say "They call this a galleta."
You're correct that (B) is supported in the passage, but here it simply doesn't answer the question, which is about the phrase "in England."
(B) more correctly answers the question, "What does the word 'dower' do?"