by giladedelman Tue Oct 12, 2010 6:45 pm
Thanks for posting!
We know that most ants use pheromone as a guide between food and home (personally, I use Google Maps), but that pheromone disappears almost immediately when the temperature goes over 45 degrees, as it typically does in the afternoon in the Sahara. So if you're in the Sahara on a typical afternoon, and you're an ant, chances are you're not using pheromone as a guide -- you'd have nothing to follow!
(C) is correct for that reason. If any ants live in the Sahara and only look for food in the afternoon, at which time it's typically over 45 degrees, then those ants generally (notice how typically and generally match up) don't use pheromone to guide themselves. Why not? Because the pheromone would evaporate instantly, and therefore be of no use as a guide!
We don't need to assume anything about ants' knowledge or backup plans. Maybe the ants don't have a backup plan (no Google Maps?), and they die -- we don't care! All we care about is what we can infer, and we can infer that they don't use pheromone to guide themselves, because it would be impossible.
Now, (E) is incorrect not because of the word "Saharan," but because of the discussion of efficiency. We know how the temperature affects the ants' use of pheromone, but we have no clue as to the relative efficiency of their food-foraging when they are or are not using pheromone. For all we know, they're more efficient when they rely on Google Maps instead of pheromone!
(A) is incorrect because we can't infer anything about when most ants forage for food.
(B) is incorrect because we don't know anything about "most ants that do not use pheromone."
(D) is incorrect because we have no idea what ants would use instead of pheromone. (You know what I'd suggest.)
Does that answer your question?