Q11

User avatar
 
ManhattanPrepLSAT1
Thanks Received: 1909
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 2851
Joined: October 07th, 2009
 
 
 

Q11

by ManhattanPrepLSAT1 Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:26 am

[MODERATOR'S NOTE: we deleted the accompanying image because there was an error in it. Please see the explanation below.]
 
Jay11
Thanks Received: 2
Vinny Gambini
Vinny Gambini
 
Posts: 3
Joined: August 12th, 2017
 
This post thanked 1 time.
 
 

Re: Q11

by Jay11 Wed Apr 25, 2018 6:07 pm

The rules are correct, but the placement of the elements on the diagram is not correct.
User avatar
 
ohthatpatrick
Thanks Received: 3808
Atticus Finch
Atticus Finch
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: April 01st, 2011
 
 
 

Re: Q11

by ohthatpatrick Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:49 pm

Thanks for catching that. I, unfortunately, have no way to access or change that image, but here's a quick explanation.

The condition starts us off with T in 1 and Y in 4.
We should write those in,
T __ __ Y __ __ __
and then ask ourselves about T, Y, and spots 1 and 4 in the rules.

T - S tells us nothing, since if T is in 1, S will automatically be after T.
Y is not 7th tells us nothing, because we already know Y is 4th.
The last rule talks about P being 1st, and since we know that P is not 1st, we know that Y is NOT before V.

Hence, we know for this problem that it's V - Y.
We also know that S is in one of the first three spots, so S and V will be occupying spots 2 and 3.

T (S, V) Y __ __ __

Who's left?
P - W and Z

So we could write that as
T (S, V) Y (Z, P - W)

(A) Not mandatory. P could be 5th
(B) Not mandatory. S could be 3rd
(C) Yes. V is either 2 or 3, so it's no later than 3rd.
(D) Not mandatory. W could be 6th
(E) Not mandatory. Z could be 5th.